disbarringthecritics.blogspot.com
Disbarring the Critics: Federal Court Strikes Down How Judges are Elected in Marion County; Is Judicial Slating the Next to Fall?
http://disbarringthecritics.blogspot.com/2014/10/federal-court-strikes-down-how-judges.html
The assumption that respect for the judiciary can be won by shielding judges from published criticism wrongly appraises the character of American public opinion.[A]n enforced silence, however limited, solely in the name of preserving the dignity of the bench, would probably engender resentment, suspicion, and contempt much more than it would enhance respect." Justice Hugo Black, Bridges v. California (1951). Friday, October 10, 2014. Besides the issue of electing Marion County judges in the general elect...
disbarringthecritics.blogspot.com
Disbarring the Critics: September 2014
http://disbarringthecritics.blogspot.com/2014_09_01_archive.html
The assumption that respect for the judiciary can be won by shielding judges from published criticism wrongly appraises the character of American public opinion.[A]n enforced silence, however limited, solely in the name of preserving the dignity of the bench, would probably engender resentment, suspicion, and contempt much more than it would enhance respect." Justice Hugo Black, Bridges v. California (1951). Wednesday, September 17, 2014. Then, as the Gazette notes, you have the issue of the arrest on a ...
nysystemabuse.blogspot.com
New York's system abuse: June 2014
http://nysystemabuse.blogspot.com/2014_06_01_archive.html
New York's system abuse. Saturday, June 28, 2014. How to be successful in dealing with inmates. How to be successful in dealing with inmates. Subscribe to: Posts (Atom). How to be successful in dealing with inmates. Independence of the Legal Profession and Judicial Accountability in the United States. The schizophrenic dissent of the 9th Circuit re Trump's executive order - continuing to call for public respect of judges' dishonorable actions will only breed more public contempt of the judiciary.
protectionfromcps.blogspot.com
On protection of parents and children from child protectors: A lawsuit in federal court in Wisconsin challenges government's authority to take a pregnant mother in custody to protect her unborn fetus
http://protectionfromcps.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-lawsuit-in-federal-court-in-wisconsin.html
On protection of parents and children from child protectors. Friday, April 24, 2015. A lawsuit in federal court in Wisconsin challenges government's authority to take a pregnant mother in custody to protect her unborn fetus. New York Family Court Act allows child protective services only towards children in being, who have been already born alive. Yet, in practice and in reality, that jurisdictional restriction is often violated when CPS pursues mothers for alcohol or substance abuse during pregnancy.
nysystemabuse.blogspot.com
New York's system abuse: April 2015
http://nysystemabuse.blogspot.com/2015_04_01_archive.html
New York's system abuse. Saturday, April 11, 2015. COULDN'T OF SAID THIS BETTER! Independence of Representation in Court and Judicial Accountability in the United States: When the prosecutor is asserting the best interest. I reported on this blog back in September 2014 of the vehicular assault by a police officer Derek Bowie upon Barbara O'Sullivan of Delhi. Friday, April 10, 2015. YES YES MOTION DECISION IS UNCOVERED . WebCivil Supreme - Motion Detail. BARBARA OSULLIVAN vs. DEREK BOWIE. Now April 7th ha...
protectionfromcps.blogspot.com
On protection of parents and children from child protectors: November 2016
http://protectionfromcps.blogspot.com/2016_11_01_archive.html
On protection of parents and children from child protectors. Tuesday, November 15, 2016. New York State Office of Family and Children's Services: no confidentiality agreements are sought from "trainees" before disclosing to them parents' confidential information and no procedures exist preventing re-disclosure. On November 4, 2016, I have. Within 10 days, I received a reply from NYS OCFS. Here it is, in its full glory. I will remind my readers what I was asking for in that FOIL:. 3) NYS OCFS did not foll...
disbarringthecritics.blogspot.com
Disbarring the Critics: November 2014
http://disbarringthecritics.blogspot.com/2014_11_01_archive.html
The assumption that respect for the judiciary can be won by shielding judges from published criticism wrongly appraises the character of American public opinion.[A]n enforced silence, however limited, solely in the name of preserving the dignity of the bench, would probably engender resentment, suspicion, and contempt much more than it would enhance respect." Justice Hugo Black, Bridges v. California (1951). Tuesday, November 25, 2014. Sketch of JoAnne Marie Denison. In December 2009, the probate court f...
disbarringthecritics.blogspot.com
Disbarring the Critics: American Bar Association Task Force Fails to Offer More than Marginal Reform of Law Schools, Legal Profession
http://disbarringthecritics.blogspot.com/2015/02/american-bar-association-task-force.html
The assumption that respect for the judiciary can be won by shielding judges from published criticism wrongly appraises the character of American public opinion.[A]n enforced silence, however limited, solely in the name of preserving the dignity of the bench, would probably engender resentment, suspicion, and contempt much more than it would enhance respect." Justice Hugo Black, Bridges v. California (1951). Saturday, February 14, 2015. Former Indiana Chief Justice. Randall T. Shepard. We’ve sugges...
discriminationincourt.blogspot.com
Discrimination in court: Is the federal statute allowing sua sponte dismissal of civil rights acitons filed by pro se indigent parties unconstitutional?
http://discriminationincourt.blogspot.com/2014/05/is-federal-statute-allowing-sua-sponte.html
There is no equal justice for all and no rule of law where there is no equal access to court. When the government creates rules that make access to court more difficult or more costly for litigants on the basis of their indigence, pro se status or on any other ground, the rule of law, the principle of equal justice for and ultimately the democracy in the United States are all undermined. Friday, May 2, 2014. Yet, one case stood out. It introduced me to the area of federal law I did not know about and...
discriminationincourt.blogspot.com
Discrimination in court: May 2014
http://discriminationincourt.blogspot.com/2014_05_01_archive.html
There is no equal justice for all and no rule of law where there is no equal access to court. When the government creates rules that make access to court more difficult or more costly for litigants on the basis of their indigence, pro se status or on any other ground, the rule of law, the principle of equal justice for and ultimately the democracy in the United States are all undermined. Tuesday, May 20, 2014. Unequal rules for pro se and represented parties and how they hurt. What difference does it make.
